| With some delay reproduce this document | |
| World People's Conference on Climate Change and the Rights of the Mother Earth April 22, 2010 - Cochabamba , Bolivia Today, our Mother Earth is wounded and the future of humanity is in danger. to increase global warming more than 2 º C, what we lead the so-called "Understanding the Copenhagen there is a 50% probability that the damage caused to our Mother Earth are totally irreversible. Between 20% and 30% of species would be in danger of disappearing. Large tracts of forest would be affected, droughts and floods would affect different regions of the planet, deserts extend and exacerbate the melting icecaps and glaciers in the Andes and the Himalayas. Many island states disappear and Africa suffer a temperature increase of more than 3 º C. Likewise, reduced food production in the world with catastrophic effects on the survival of the inhabitants of vast regions of the planet and would increase from dramatically the number of hungry in the world, which already exceeds the figure of 1,020 million people. corporations and governments of countries called "more developed" in complicity with a segment of the scientific community, put us to discuss climate change as a problem limited to the rise of temperature without question the cause that is the capitalist system. confront the terminal crisis of the patriarchal model of civilization based on the subjugation and destruction of human beings and nature that accelerated with the industrial revolution. The capitalist system has imposed a logic of competition, progress and unlimited growth. This mode of production and consumption seeks profit without limitation, separating man from nature, establishing a logic of domination over it, turning everything into a commodity: water, earth, the human genome, ancestral cultures, biodiversity , justice, ethics, rights of peoples, death and life itself. Under capitalism, the Earth Mother becomes the only source of raw material and human means of production and consumers, people who are worth what they have and not for what they are. Capitalism requires a strong military industry to the process of accumulation and control of territories and natural resources, suppressing people's resistance. It is an imperialist system of colonization of the planet. Humanity is facing a great dilemma: to continue in the path of capitalism, predation and death, or the path of harmony with nature and respect for life. require building a new system to restore harmony with nature and among humans. Can only be a balance with nature if there is equity among human beings. Put to the peoples of the world recovery, empowerment and strengthening of knowledge, wisdom and traditional practices of indigenous peoples, predicated on the experience and proposal of "Living Well "recognizing the Mother Earth as a living being, with whom we have an indivisible, interdependent, complementary and spiritual. To address climate change must recognize the Mother Earth as the source of life and forge a new system based on the principles of:
The model we advocate is not destructive or unlimited development. Countries need to produce goods and services to meet basic needs of its population, but by no means can continue on this path of development in which richer countries have a carbon footprint 5 times larger than the planet can bear. Today has already been exceeded by more than 30% the planet's capacity to regenerate. At this rate of exploitation of our Mother Earth will need 2 planets by 2030. an interdependent system in which human beings are one of its components is not possible to recognize rights only to the human side without causing an imbalance in the system. To guarantee human rights and to restore harmony with nature is necessary to recognize and implement effectively the rights of Mother Earth. We propose the attached draft Universal Declaration of Mother Earth in which are recorded:
The shared vision is to stabilize concentrations of greenhouse gases to give effect to Article 2 of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change which determines the "stabilization of concentrations of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere at a level that would prevent dangerous anthropogenic interference the climate system. " Our vision is based on the historical principle of common but differentiated responsibilities, to demand that developed countries commit to quantified targets for reducing emissions that return the concentration of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere at 300 ppm and thus limiting the increase in global mean temperature to a maximum level of 1 C. Emphasizing the need for urgent action to achieve this vision, and with the support of the people, movements and countries, developed countries should commit to ambitious targets for reducing emissions that achieve short-term objectives, while maintaining our vision for the balance of the Earth's climate system, according to the ultimate objective of the Convention. The "shared vision" for the "Long-term Cooperative Action" should not be reduced to the climate change negotiations set the limit on increasing the temperature and the concentration of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere but must understand a comprehensive and balanced set of financial, technological adaptation, capacity building, patterns of production, consumption and other essentials such as the recognition of rights of Mother Earth to restore harmony with nature. developed countries the main cause of climate change, assuming your historical responsibility and current, must recognize and honor their climate debt in all its dimensions, as the basis for a just, effective and scientific change. In this context we urge the developed countries:
The focus should be not only financial compensation but principally of restorative justice - that is restoring integrity to the people and the members who form a community of life on Earth. deplore the attempt by a group of countries to cancel the Kyoto Protocol, the only specific binding instrument for reducing emissions of greenhouse gases in developed countries. warn the world that despite being legally bound emissions of developed countries rather than reduce, grew by 11.2% between 1990 and 2007. United States because of the unlimited consumption of GHG emissions increased by 16.8% over the period 1990 to 2007, issuing on average between 20 and 23 tonnes of CO2 per capita, which represents more than 9 times emissions for an average inhabitant of the Third World, and more than 20 times the emissions of an inhabitant of sub-Saharan Africa. Absolutely reject the illegitimate "Understanding Copenhagen", which allows developed countries offer insufficient reductions of greenhouse gases, based on voluntary commitments and individuals that violate the environmental integrity of the Mother land leads to increased about 4 º C. Next Climate Change Conference to be held later this year in Mexico should adopt the amendment to the Kyoto Protocol, for the second commitment period to begin in 2013 to 2017 in which developed countries must commit significant domestic reductions of at least 50% compared to 1990 base excluding carbon markets or other diversion systems that mask the failure of actual reductions in emissions of greenhouse gases. require first establish a goal for all developed countries and then make individual allocations for each country developed in the context of a comparison of effort between each of them, thus maintaining the system of the Kyoto Protocol for emission reductions. United States of America, as the sole country Land of Annex 1 which did not ratify the Kyoto Protocol is a significant responsibility to all peoples of the world as it should ratify the Kyoto Protocol and commit to respect and comply with the emissions reduction targets at their entire economy. The people have the same rights of protection to the impacts of climate change and reject the notion of adaptation to climate change understood as the resignation to the impacts caused by historic emissions of developed countries, who must adapt their lifestyles and consumption to this planetary emergency. We are forced to confront climate change impacts, considering adaptation as a process and not as an imposition, and also as a tool that serves to counteract this, showing that it is possible to live in harmony under a different model of life. need build an Adaptation Fund, as an exclusive fund to address climate change as part of a financial mechanism operated and managed in a sovereign, transparent and equitable for our states. Under this fund should be evaluated: the impacts and costs in developing countries and that these impacts needs arise, and record and monitor the support from countries developed. It also must handle a mechanism for compensation for damage incurred and future impacts, loss of opportunity and replacement by extreme weather events and gradual and incremental costs that could arise if our planet exceeds the thresholds and ecological impacts that are holding the right to live well. The "Understanding the Copenhagen imposed on developing countries by some States, beyond offering insufficient resources, intends to divide itself and face the people and seeks to extort money from developing countries conditional access resources to adapt to change mitigation. Additionally, states as unacceptable in international negotiation processes attempt to categorize developing countries by their vulnerability to climate change, creating disputes, inequality and segregation between them. The immense challenge we face as humanity to stop global warming and cooling the planet will only be achieved by carrying out a profound transformation of agriculture into a sustainable model of agricultural production peasant and indigenous / native, and other models and practices ecological ancestral help solve the problem of change climate change and ensure food sovereignty, understood as the right of peoples to control their own seeds, land, water and food production, ensuring, through production in harmony with Mother Earth, local and culturally appropriate access of people to sufficient, varied and nutritious supplementation with Mother Earth and deepening the independent production (participatory, community and shared) in every nation and people. Climate change is already having profound impacts on agriculture and livelihoods of indigenous / native and peasants of the world and these impacts will be worse in the future. The agro business through its social, economic and cultural global capitalist production and the logic of food production for the market and not to fulfill the right to food, is one of the main causes climate change. Its technological tools, commercial and political do nothing but deepen the climate crisis and increasing hunger in the world. For this reason we reject the Free Trade and Association Agreements and all forms of implementation of Intellectual Property Rights on life, current technological packages (chemicals, GM) and those who offer themselves as false solutions (biofuels, geo-engineering, nanotechnology, and the like Terminator technology) only exacerbate the current crisis. At the same time denounce as this capitalist model imposes mega infrastructure projects, extractive projects invade territories, water privatization and commodification militarized territories and expelling the indigenous peoples and farmers from their lands by preventing and deepening Food Sovereignty social and environmental crisis. demand to recognize the right of all peoples, living beings and Mother Earth to access and enjoy the water and support the proposal of the Government of Bolivia to recognize water as a fundamental human right. The definition of forest used in the negotiations of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change, which includes plantations, is unacceptable. Monocultures are not forests. Therefore, we require a definition for trading purposes that recognizes the native forests and the forest and diverse ecosystems on earth. The UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples must be fully recognized, implemented and integrated into the negotiations climate change. The best strategy and action to prevent deforestation and degradation and protect native forests and the forest is to recognize and guarantee the collective rights of indigenous lands and territories, especially considering that most of the forests are in the territories of indigenous peoples and nations , and traditional farming communities. condemn market mechanisms, and the mechanism of REDD (Reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation) and their versions + and + +, which is violating the sovereignty of Peoples and their right to free, prior and informed and to sovereignty of nation states, and violates the rights and customs of Indigenous Peoples and the Rights of Nature. The polluting countries are obliged to transfer directly the economic and technological resources to pay for restoration and maintenance of forests, for the people and organizational structures ancestral indigenous and campesino. This should be a direct compensation and additional sources of funding committed by developed countries outside of the carbon market and never serve as carbon offsets (offsets). We demand that countries stop initiatives local forests and forest based on market mechanisms and propose results and conditional non-existent. We call on governments worldwide program to restore native forests and woodlands, and is run by the people, implementing forest seeds, fruit trees and native flora. Governments should eliminate forest concessions and support the conservation of oil in the ground and urgently stop the exploitation of hydrocarbons in the jungles. We urge States to recognize, respect and ensure the effective implementation of international standards of human rights and the rights of Indigenous Peoples, in particular the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, ILO Convention 169, and other relevant instruments in the negotiations, policies and measures to meet the challenges posed by climate change. In particular, we call upon States to legally recognize the prior existence of the rights to our territories, lands and natural resources to enable and strengthen our traditional ways of life and contribute effectively to solving climate change. demand the full and effective implementation of the right to consultation, participation and the free, prior and informed Indigenous Peoples in all negotiation processes in the design and implementation of climate change measures. environmental degradation and climate change will reach critical levels, one of the main consequences of internal migration and international. According to some projections in 1995 there were about 25 million climate migrants, this is estimated at 50 million and projections for 2050 are from 200 to 1000 million people will be displaced by situations resulting from climate change. Developed countries must take responsibility for climate migrants, welcoming them into their territories and recognizing their fundamental rights through the signing of international conventions providing for the definition of migrant climate that all States abide by its determinations. Establish an International Tribunal of Conscience to expose, make visible, document, try and punish violations of the rights of the (s) migrants, refugees (as) and displaced persons in countries of origin, transit and destination, identifying clearly the responsibilities of states, companies and others. Current funding to developing countries for climate change and the proposal of Understanding Copenhagen is insignificant. Developed countries must commit to a new annual funding, additional to official development assistance and public source of at least 6% of its GDP to tackle climate change in developing countries. This is feasible considering that a similar amount spent on national defense and spent 5 times more to bail out banks and speculators, which raises serious questions about its global priorities and political will. This funding should be direct, unconditional and not violate national sovereignty and self-determination of communities and groups most affected. Given the inefficiency of the current mechanism in the Mexico conference should establish a new funding mechanism that operates under the authority of the Conference of the Parties to the Framework Convention on Climate Change United Nations yielding accounts to it, with a significant representation of developing countries to ensure compliance with funding commitments of Annex 1 countries. has been found that developed countries increased their emissions over the period 1990 - 2007, however have stated that the reduction would be substantially contributed to market mechanisms. The carbon market has become a lucrative business by commercializing our Mother Earth, this is not an alternative to tackling climate change, as looting, ravaging the land, water and even life itself. The recent financial crisis has shown that the market is unable to regulate the financial system that is fragile and uncertain amid speculation and the emergence of brokers, therefore, would be totally irresponsible to leave in your hands care and protection of one's existence human and our Mother Earth. consider it unacceptable that the current negotiations seeking to create new mechanisms to expand and promote the carbon market given that existing mechanisms never solved the problem of climate change and are transformed into real action and direct reduction greenhouse gas. is essential to require compliance with the commitments made by developed countries at the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change regarding the development and transfer of technology and reject the "technological showcase" given by countries developed technology that only market. It is essential to establish guidelines to create a multilateral, multidisciplinary and participatory control, management and ongoing evaluation of the exchange of technologies. These technologies must be useful, clean, and socially appropriate. It is equally essential to establish a fund for financing and inventory of appropriate technologies and free of intellectual property rights, including patent monopolies should move from private to public domain, freely accessible and low cost. Knowledge is universal, and for any reason may be owned private and private use, nor its applications in the form of technology. It is the duty of developed countries to share their technology with developing countries, to create research centers to create own technologies and innovations, as well as defending and promoting its development and application for living well. The world needs to recover, learn, relearn the principles and approaches of the ancient legacy of indigenous peoples to stop the destruction of the planet, as well as knowledge and practices of spirituality and recovery in rehabilitation of living well together with Mother Earth. Considering the lack of political will by developed countries to effectively fulfill its commitments and obligations made at the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change and the Kyoto Protocol, and against the lack of an international legal body to prevent and punish all those crimes and climatic and environmental violate the rights of Mother Earth and humanity demand the creation of an International Court of Justice Climate and Environmental have binding legal capacity to prevent, prosecute and punish States , companies and people who by act or omission causing contamination and climate change. Supporting States to submit claims in the International Court of Justice against developed countries that do not meet their commitments under the Convention United Nations Framework on Climate Change and the Kyoto Protocol reduction commitments including greenhouse gas. urge the people to propose and promote a deep reform of the United Nations Organization (UNO), so that all Member States comply with the decisions of the International Court of Justice Climate and Environmental. The future of humanity is in danger and we can not accept a group of leaders of countries want to define for all countries as they tried to do unsuccessfully at the Conference of the Parties in Copenhagen. This decision rests with us all peoples. Therefore it is necessary to conduct a world referendum, plebiscite or referendum on climate change in what we are all consulted on: the level of emission reductions to be made by developed countries and transnational corporations, the financing to be developed countries, the creation of an International Court of Justice Climate: the need for a Universal Declaration of Mother Earth, the need to change the current capitalist system. World Referendum process, plebiscite or referendum will depend to a process of preparation to ensure the successful development of it. order to coordinate our international activities and implement the results of this "Agreement of the People" called to build a Global People's Movement for Mother Earth, which is based on the principles of complementarity and respect for diversity of origin and visions of its members, constituting a broad and democratic space for coordination and joint action worldwide. To this end, we adopted the global action plan attached to that in Mexico the developed countries of Annex 1 to respect the legal framework and reduce emissions of greenhouse gases by 50% and the assumption of the various proposals contained in this Agreement. Finally, we agree to hold the 2 nd World Conference of the Peoples on Climate Change and the Rights of Mother Earth in 2011 as part of this process of building the World People's Movement for Mother Earth and react to the results of the Climate Change Conference to be held later this year in Cancun, Mexico |
Tuesday, February 22, 2011
Definition Of Democracy
AGREEMENT OF THE CONDOR
Tuesday, February 15, 2011
How Big Is The Brazilian Waxing Paper?
As we have set goals for this year, Elisa began his series of tournaments in 2011 with the important FISS 2011, playing for the first time the prize in this competition, while Elisa was already playing some tournaments open had been previous tests and experiments in order to see how he could go and develop, and test the spirit and enthusiasm that Elisa could play these tournaments, considering that it was no longer competing for a first goal, but trying to get a good turnout, and with the clear idea that rather than go to get points was to play good games. So that definitely was raised as a starting point in terms of open tournaments, the FISS 2011. In 7 games played
Elisa managed to get 3 points, all the games he played were played with adolescents or adults, all their games played only the men, none of them touched a girl's tournament. The result seems a good first step, taking into account will not be easy for she used to play from now on only adults. Elisa told us, among other things, for example, the fact that it was always difficult to implement well-disciplined lines studied, since playing with adults usually ended up stuck on concepts of openings and lines that she did not know. The items were lost in some cases fought well as in other cases could barely pass the starting throwing punches and kicks the air. Of a total of 86 players in the premier, since Elisa has reached the position of 64, tied to 49 all with 3 points. FISS tournament at the end of 2011 Elisa received a merit medal successes in national and international tournaments in 2010, a situation that filled him with joy and fell by total surprise. For information visit the pages friendly results: www.ajedrezaurinegro.blogspot.com,
www.zeitnot.com.ve www.ajedrezvinotinto.com and Elisa Next week will be playing the qualifying rounds for the Under 20 men, we will be reporting on how you was.
Elisa Playing the sixth round
Moment of FISS 2011 awards
Monday, February 7, 2011
What Do Dots Mean On A Preganancy Test
QUALIFYING TOURNAMENT SUB 20 MALE INTERNATIONAL FAIR SAN SEBASTIAN, February 2011
Elisa For this year 2011 has created new horizons at the level of challenges mean new roads and transit challenge old ideas rooted in underestimation and machismo, to fully enter the new boom in women's chess in the world. It is no secret the level showing the chess men compared with women's chess, positions than men's in the open tournaments is far from those achieved by women, awards among the women and men are totally opposite points and remote elo relationship between male and female category of the same age is clear, the reason is obviously related to something that goes far beyond just saying, is that men play better chess than women, idea of all totally vague and baseless of any kind, as if change is real and true, namely that the ratio of men playing chess and women who play, is based on official reports of the FIDE, in more or less a player for every 100 male players about.
is also true that it has stereotyped the image of man as the best player and certainly women, consciously or unconsciously, this idea ends up seeping into the players who eventually believe it, and legitimate reason for saying this is the fact refuse to play by general and children's categories with men in predisposition to this idea. Judith Polgar clarified in an interview that the level of challenges faced by girls who play chess are low compared to that of men under that there are few models that serve as examples, and motivated than their parents or coaches are the major challenges met by men as distant goals for them.
is why among the challenges posed by Elisa for this year is the final stop playing children's categories in the national tournaments to replace the premier, will try to participate in as many valid and men's tournaments can be a regional and national level (where there are no objections or problems as already presented to us in the past, where you see with eyes of suspicion so that a girl is playing with men), in order de que Elisa comprenda el esfuerzo extra y el nivel de competición más elevado que hay cuando quiera ganar torneos con participación masculina. Además que no queremos seguir teniendo la experiencia de llevar a Elisa a un torneo y ver jugar 4 ó 5 niñas entre ellas mismas (a veces incluso las mismas de siempre), mientras los hombres juegan entre 30 o más, obviamente y sin llegar a ser tan objetivo es claro que esto obstaculiza un entrenamiento de exigencia y compromisos en cuanto que la jugadora además de no tener la misma exigencia y experiencia que en el caso del masculino, podría crear al mismo tiempo un hábito mal acostumbrado de jugar con las mismas niñas de siempre y sin exigirse más de lo que siempre da al jugar con them.
And no pretensions to believe more than anyone, the idea of \u200b\u200bthese challenges continue to increase gradually under its level at the same time rid herself of any belief that men can play better chess for some genetic affinity at all tested. For now, the tournaments are those federated women will play for its category and are considered among the most important national or international, as will gradually yielding results and assessments of the results obtained will be taking other steps cooperate their playing strength.
With Dad on the Laguna dos Patos de Porto Alegre Brazil August 2010
With Paul my coach, my younger sister and in the corner my friend Fabio in Puerto Fijo September 2010
The Children's Museum Caracas 2010
On the beaches of Copacabana Brazil December 2009
In Rio de Janeiro Corcovado December 2009
In Brazil 2009
Piraí
with my friend power the world champion Adriana Cuta, she went to Uruguay to Brazil
I
With my mother in the famous Public Market of Porto Alegre Brazil 2010
With the protagonist of Lord of the Rings and Fabian at the airport in Buenos Aires 2009
Background
TransMilenio in Bogota, Colombia October 2009
Peace Monument Trujillo 2010
The Aurora wine with mom in Bento Goncalves Brazil August 2010
With the sea lions at Mar del Plata Argentina August 2009
smoke on the train Maria Bento Goncalves Brazil August 2010
Avenida Corrientes Buenos Aires
August 2009
Chess Museum in Buenos Aires in August 2009
Cabure Falls Edo. October 2010
Falcon
Theme Park Medellín 2010
Medellín Zoo in December 2010
Metro de Medellín in December 2010
With my brother Alejandro with a statue of F . Botero in Medellín 2010
Elisa For this year 2011 has created new horizons at the level of challenges mean new roads and transit challenge old ideas rooted in underestimation and machismo, to fully enter the new boom in women's chess in the world. It is no secret the level showing the chess men compared with women's chess, positions than men's in the open tournaments is far from those achieved by women, awards among the women and men are totally opposite points and remote elo relationship between male and female category of the same age is clear, the reason is obviously related to something that goes far beyond just saying, is that men play better chess than women, idea of all totally vague and baseless of any kind, as if change is real and true, namely that the ratio of men playing chess and women who play, is based on official reports of the FIDE, in more or less a player for every 100 male players about.
is also true that it has stereotyped the image of man as the best player and certainly women, consciously or unconsciously, this idea ends up seeping into the players who eventually believe it, and legitimate reason for saying this is the fact refuse to play by general and children's categories with men in predisposition to this idea. Judith Polgar clarified in an interview that the level of challenges faced by girls who play chess are low compared to that of men under that there are few models that serve as examples, and motivated than their parents or coaches are the major challenges met by men as distant goals for them.
is why among the challenges posed by Elisa for this year is the final stop playing children's categories in the national tournaments to replace the premier, will try to participate in as many valid and men's tournaments can be a regional and national level (where there are no objections or problems as already presented to us in the past, where you see with eyes of suspicion so that a girl is playing with men), in order de que Elisa comprenda el esfuerzo extra y el nivel de competición más elevado que hay cuando quiera ganar torneos con participación masculina. Además que no queremos seguir teniendo la experiencia de llevar a Elisa a un torneo y ver jugar 4 ó 5 niñas entre ellas mismas (a veces incluso las mismas de siempre), mientras los hombres juegan entre 30 o más, obviamente y sin llegar a ser tan objetivo es claro que esto obstaculiza un entrenamiento de exigencia y compromisos en cuanto que la jugadora además de no tener la misma exigencia y experiencia que en el caso del masculino, podría crear al mismo tiempo un hábito mal acostumbrado de jugar con las mismas niñas de siempre y sin exigirse más de lo que siempre da al jugar con them.
And no pretensions to believe more than anyone, the idea of \u200b\u200bthese challenges continue to increase gradually under its level at the same time rid herself of any belief that men can play better chess for some genetic affinity at all tested. For now, the tournaments are those federated women will play for its category and are considered among the most important national or international, as will gradually yielding results and assessments of the results obtained will be taking other steps cooperate their playing strength.
With Paul my coach, my younger sister and in the corner my friend Fabio in Puerto Fijo September 2010
The Children's Museum Caracas 2010
On the beaches of Copacabana Brazil December 2009
In Rio de Janeiro Corcovado December 2009
In Brazil 2009
with my friend power the world champion Adriana Cuta, she went to Uruguay to Brazil
With my mother in the famous Public Market of Porto Alegre Brazil 2010
With the protagonist of Lord of the Rings and Fabian at the airport in Buenos Aires 2009
Background
TransMilenio in Bogota, Colombia October 2009
Peace Monument Trujillo 2010
The Aurora wine with mom in Bento Goncalves Brazil August 2010
With the sea lions at Mar del Plata Argentina August 2009
smoke on the train Maria Bento Goncalves Brazil August 2010
Avenida Corrientes Buenos Aires
August 2009
Chess Museum in Buenos Aires in August 2009
Cabure Falls Edo. October 2010
Theme Park Medellín 2010
Medellín Zoo in December 2010
Metro de Medellín in December 2010
With my brother Alejandro with a statue of F . Botero in Medellín 2010
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)